Interesting points, vociferously and repetitively made. All retired officers and enlisted subject to recall, are therefore subject to the UCMJ. Many years ago the "you-can't-criticize" crowd tried to carry this over to articles in the Naval Institute Proceedings and failed. Interesting points made here that refute some of the absolutism espoused by the author (https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB10945#:~:text=The%20Supreme%20Court %20has%20not,them%20subject%20to%20military%20law). Guess we should preface our opinions with the word, "Respectfully . . ." Wonder what's going on in the JO Jungle? Fly Navy, Andy From: mgbrattland@gerlecreek.com <mgbrattland@gerlecreek.com> Sent: Saturday, November 1, 2025 10:14 AM To: HeloBubbas <helobubbas@helobubbas.com> Subject: [Helobubbas] Insubordinate Officers Publicly Attack The Secretary Of War https://thefederalist.com/2025/10/31/insubordinate-officers-publicly-attack- the-secretary-of-war/